Trump threatens to sue the Pulitzer board for prices for Russia stories

0
40

""Donald Trump"" – Google News

Donald Trump threatens to sue the Pulitzer Prize board if he does not withdraw the 2018 National Reporting Prize from the New York Times and the Washington Post, which the news agencies jointly won for their investigation into Russia’s influence on the 2016 elections.

“This request that the Pulitzer Prize Board of Directors take immediate steps to withdraw the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting from the New York Times and Washington Post. If the Pulitzer Prize Board fails to do so, legal action will be taken immediately. Please allow yourself to be guided accordingly, ”wrote Trump’s attorney Alina Habba in a letter to Bud Kliment, the interim administrator of the awards.

The former president, who angrily denied having won any help from Moscow in 2016, cited a federal indictment alleging that Russian-born analyst Igor Danchenko, a key source for the infamous and unfounded Christopher Steele dossier, was involved in talks fabricated and used from one source by one democratic political agent than another.

Danchenko pleaded not guilty to five charges of lying to the FBI last week. His arrest was made by Special Counsel John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Crossfire hurricane investigation, which alleges Trump plotted with Russia during the 2016 election.

As a result, the Washington Post corrected two articles that contained references to the Steele dossier – but none of these articles were part of the quote that the newspaper received from its Pulitzer.

Trump cited this correction in his complaint to the Pulitzer board of directors.

‘Even one of the awardees, the Washington Post, has acknowledged the baseless nature of its coverage of these events. In particular, on November 12, 2021, The Post withdrew statements from several articles relating to the Steele dossier and the alleged Russia-Trump connection, and its editor-in-chief announced that “The Post no longer upholds the veracity of these elements of the story can. “Noted his lawyer letter.

Trump’s attorney complained that the articles were “based on undeniably false information provided by dubious sources that maliciously tried to mislead the public and damage our client’s reputation.”

In 2018, ten reporters from the New York Times and the Washington Post jointly won the Pulitzer for National Coverage for their “deep, relentless reporting in the public interest that enhances the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the.” Trump campaign, the transition team of the elected president and his future administration, ”the committee said.

But in the list of items the Pultizer Committee cites as the reason for the award, there is little about the Steele dossier. The award-winning articles included stories about the actions of former Trump campaign assistant George Papadopoulos, Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with Russian officials, Russia’s actions on social media, and Michael Flynn’s communication with the Russian ambassador to the United States.

A New York Times article on Papadopoulos mentions the dossier but does not address his allegations. And a Washington Post article examined how the FBI paid Christopher Steele to continue its investigation into Russian actions.

Donald Trump threatens to sue the Pulitzer Prize board if he does not withdraw the 2018 National Reporting Prize from the New York Times and the Washington Post, which the news agencies jointly won for their investigation into Russia’s influence on the 2016 elections

In 2018, ten reporters from the New York Times and the Washington Post jointly won the Pulitzer for National Coverage for their “deep, relentless coverage” of Russia's influence in 2016 - the reporters are shown above

In 2018, ten reporters from the New York Times and the Washington Post jointly won the Pulitzer for National Coverage for their “deep, relentless coverage” of Russia’s influence in 2016 – the reporters are shown above

Christopher Steele's controversial dossier was full of unsubstantiated allegations, including allegations that the Russians had extortion material about Trump, which Trump denied;  above Steele and his lawyer arrive outside a London courthouse in July 2020

Christopher Steele’s controversial dossier was full of unsubstantiated allegations, including allegations that the Russians had extortion material about Trump, which Trump denied; above Steele and his lawyer arrive outside a London courthouse in July 2020

The Steele dossier played a pivotal role in obtaining FISA arrest warrants for then-Trump campaign aide Carter Page, who was the focus of an investigation into whether Trump’s campaign with the Russians was working. The dossier was read by many news outlets and was the basis for several Trump conspiracy theories.

Trump had already called for the Pulitzers to be lifted last month.

According to the board of directors, the entries for a Pultizer award will be judged by 77 editors, publishers, writers and educators. Pulitzer Prize Board members and journalist jurors do not receive any compensation.

The awarding of the prizes takes place by majority decision by the board on the basis of the recommendations of the jurors.

Bonuses have been canceled in the past. Most famously, the 1981 Pulitzer Awards Committee stripped Washington Post reporter Janet Cooke’s award for feature films after she admitted that her award-winning story was made up about an alleged 8-year-old heroin addict in the District of Columbia.

In his March 2019 report, Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence that the Trump campaign “coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its electoral interference activities.”

However, it turned out that Russia interfered in the 2016 competition “in a comprehensive and systematic manner”, which ultimately benefited Trump.

Trump praised Durham for its work, claiming last week it would “only go deeper” from here.

Durham's two and a half year investigation has so far produced two charges and is still ongoing

Durham’s two and a half year investigation has so far produced two charges and is still ongoing

Christopher Steele’s dossier was controversial from the start, with its unsubstantiated claim that the Russians had extortionate material about Trump – including an alleged “golden shower” incident. Trump vehemently denied the allegations.

Danchenko, 43, was the lead researcher on Steele’s dossier, which alleges Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign conspired with Russia in an undercover operation to beat Hillary Clinton, and Russia had lewd videos that could be used to blackmail Trump.

He has been charged with lying to the FBI, which he denied.

Michael Sussman, a cybersecurity attorney who worked for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, was charged in September and pleaded guilty not to lie to the FBI.

Sussman was charged with allegedly telling the FBI that he was not serving a client in September 2016 when he requested a meeting with the FBI’s General Counsel to clear them of concerns from cybersecurity researchers about potentially suspicious contacts between Russia and the Trump Warn team.

At the meeting, the lawyer allegedly gave the FBI data and analysis from cybersecurity researchers who thought the numbers might be evidence of secret communication between the Trump Organization’s computer servers and Alfa Bank – a Russian financial institution affiliated with the Kremlin. The FBI investigated the matter but found no connections.

Following the revelation of the arrests, the Washington Post took the unusual step of radically editing and publicly correcting several of its earlier stories on the dossier.

Two online articles published by the newspaper in March 2017 and February 2019 were heavily edited and accompanied by an editor’s note stating that certain allegations in the reports were “refuted by allegations in a federal indictment and others.” Reporting has been undermined ”.

In September, former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussman pleaded not guilty to charges on Durham's investigation More recently, Durham's findings led to the arrest of Russian-born analyst Igor Danchenko late last week

In September, former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussman (left) pleaded not guilty to charges against Durham’s investigation. More recently, Durham’s findings led to the arrest of Russian-born analyst Igor Danchenko (right) late last week.

An editor's note, attached to a 2017 Washington Post article, states that the newspaper now believes the report is based on inaccurate information

An editor’s note, attached to a 2017 Washington Post article, states that the newspaper now believes the report is based on inaccurate information

Both articles alleged that the Belarusian American businessman Sergei Millian was a major source of the Steele dossier.

However, the new indictment alleged that Danchenko lied when he claimed he spoke to Millian when collecting information contained in the dossier.

“As a result, portions of the story and an accompanying video were removed and the headline changed,” said a comment from the Washington Post editor.

Although guidelines vary across media, it is uncommon to extensively edit an online article and republish it when new information comes to light.

Charles H. Dolan Jr, also known as Chuck, has been identified as the source for Danchenko.  revealed

Charles H. Dolan Jr, also known as Chuck, has been identified as the source for Danchenko. revealed

Many outlets simply publish a new article with the additional information and may add an editor’s note to the obsolete article.

The Post’s original articles alleged that Millian was “Source D” of the dossier, the source claiming Russian intelligence had videos of Trump engaging in deviant behavior in a Moscow hotel room.

The new indictment suggests, but does not directly allege, that the source for this lewd allegation was, in fact, an American public relations executive, whose identity has been confirmed by his attorney to be Charles Dolan.

Dolan served as President of Bill Clinton’s two successful presidential campaigns in 1992 and 1996, and as an advisor to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign.

He also previously served as the executive director of the Democratic Governors’ Association and was an active advocate for Hillary Clinton, according to the 2016 indictment.

Former Attorney General Bill Barr hired Durham, then a U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to investigate the FBI’s Crossfire hurricane investigation from the beginning in July 2016 until the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller in May 2017.

Source Link

Leave a Reply