Lock them all up. Trump’s DOJ broke US law by ignoring its crimes



When the Senate Judiciary Committee issued its damning report, the aptly named Subverting Justice, that Trump’s attempts to force the Justice Department to undermine the 2020 elections were detailed, it was evident that crimes were being committed.

Alongside Trump, the report describes the key role played by Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark played in an attempt to convince acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen to falsely declare that the DOJ believed the election results in several states to be fraudulent.

Jeffrey Clark is now facing disciplinary action because:

“A bipartisan group of 32 lawyers filed a disciplinary complaint with the DC Bar for attempting to convince former acting Attorney General Rosen to falsely declare that the 2020 presidential election results in multiple states were fraudulent.”

Members of The Board of Lawyers Defending American Democracy says Clark’s actions violated the code of ethics.

But there is more to the story than a simple ethics violation that should trigger a spate of criminal charges to Trump and anyone at the DOJ or close circle who knew about Trump’s efforts and did not report them immediately.

First, because Trump was the source of the conspiracy, he is clearly in violation of federal law. 18 US Code § 610 – “Compulsion to Political Activity” is a very clear and concise law that clearly states:

“It is unlawful for any person to intimidate, threaten, order or force, or trying to intimidate, threaten, command or force Any federal government employee within the meaning of Section 7322 (1) of Title 5, United States Code, to engage or not participate in political activities, including, but not limited to, voting or refusing to vote for a candidate or to take action in an election, to make or refuse to make a political contribution, or to work or refuse to work on behalf of a candidate. Any person who violates this section will be fined or imprisoned for no more than three years or both under this title. “(Author in bold)

While serving an Oval Office criminal, Clark penned a letter on Trump’s behalf asking Rosen to sign and post to Georgia and several other states, falsely claiming that the DOJ had “identified significant concerns that are emerging.” could have had an impact on the outcome of the elections ”.

Of course, the allegations in the letter were blatantly false; because such concerns did not exist. In December, then Attorney General William Barr stated so. In fact, Trump’s Department of Homeland Security reiterated Barr’s opinion that the 2020 election would be “the safest in American history.”

In an effort to do the right thing, incumbent Attorney General Rosen falsely refused to state that the results of the 2020 presidential election in several states were fraudulent. Both Mr. Rosen and his deputy refused to hand over the letter. But they are also guilty of breaking the law when they refused to report Clark’s or Trump’s illegal activity.

This failure fits in perfectly with the crime of the “misprision of capital” according to 18 US Code § 4 – Misprision of Felony. It is reading:

“Anyone who has knowledge of the actual commission of a crime recognizable by a United States court, and who does not disclose it as soon as possible to a judge or other person with civil or military authority under the United States, should use this title be punished with a fine or a prison sentence of not more than three years or both. “

Anyone who is remotely aware of the crimes of Trump or one of his deputies has a legal obligation to alert the relevant authorities. It is an understatement to claim that Justice Department attorneys were unaware that what Trump was doing was in violation of federal law and that those who knew about his actions were required by law to alert the appropriate authorities immediately.

If you do not do this, the parties involved automatically run into great legal danger; At least that would be the case if Barr’s Justice Department wasn’t corrupt or the Garland DOJ wasn’t afraid of getting on Trump’s hit list.

In particular, it is an egregious violation of the law that Rosen et al. Allowing Trump and one of them to break the law and keep quiet about it. The same goes for the various state officials who Trump attempted to “coerce” against state electoral laws on his behalf and fail to report his crimes.

Obviously, not much is going to come out of Trumps or his followers, and if, and that’s a gigantic one, if Clark is held accountable by the DC Bar for violating their ethics, he’ll likely get a slap in the face and then move on to get rich in the private sector, as if nothing illegal or unethical had happened.

Countless crimes have been committed during Trump’s tenure in a place he never belonged, and it is becoming clearer day by day that he will not be brought to justice. The tragedy of it all is that apparently two different Justice Departments are not inclined to prosecute Trump or his cohorts with the same intensity as a drug dealer. This informs any sane person that the American justice system is in every way a dying institution.

Sound engineer and trainer for SAE. Writes op / ed comments that support secular humanist causes and expose the oppression of women, the poor, and minorities. An advocate for religious freedom and especially religious freedom.

Born in the South, raised in the Midwest and California to get a comprehensive look at America; it does not look good.

Former clergyman, lifelong musician, Mahayana Zen Buddhist.

Source Link

Leave a Reply